Sri Aurobindo
Bande Mataram
Calcutta, May 8th, 1907
Part Three. Bande Mataram under the Editorship
of of Sri Aurobindo (24 October 1906 – 27 May 1907)
Incompetence or Connivance
The question has been raised whether the action of the officials in Mymensingh amounts to incompetence or connivance.
In face of the open partiality of these bureaucrats, their severity to Hindus and leniency to Mahomedans, it seems absurd to ask the question.
To arrest the leading local Hindus en masse and leave the Mahomedans untouched, although influential local Mahomedans have been publicly charged by name with fomenting riots; to loot houses and cutcherries under the pretence of search with 
a Mahomedan mob at their back; to institute rigorous enquiry into the wounding of a Mahomedan and none into the death of a Hindu; to turn a deaf ear to appeals for help from threatened Hindus in the villages and delay action till the looting and outrage have been accomplished; to look on inactive in the face of a surging Mahomedan tumult and be on the alert when there is a rumour of Hindu retaliation; – all this is not incompetence, but connivance.
We could have understood it, if the authorities had been equally supine and helpless in dealing with Hindus as with Mahomedans, but this is not the case.
Compare the action of the Government in the Punjab with that of the Government in Bengal.
In the Punjab, because there was a popular riot, all the leading Hindu gentlemen have been arrested on outrageous charges, the town held by cavalry, siege-guns pointed upon it, the police ordered to butcher any group of five to be seen in the streets or public places.
If the East Bengal Nawabs and Maulavis had been similarly treated and similar measures taken in Jamalpur, we could have admired the impartial, if ferocious energy of the bureaucracy.
Compare again the action in Bengal itself.
A rumour is spread that the Hindus would attack the Mahomedan piece-goods shops in Comilla; at once Mr. Lees posts constables and himself stands on guard over the bazaar.
A rumour is spread that the Jamalpur accused are coming up with an army of volunteers and the Gurkhas are out to receive them on the station.
Compare this with the action against Mahomedan riot.
“Armed police have been sent only after the occurrence.
The authorities are taking no preventive measures.
The Magistrate is sending Gurkhas and constables after everything has been finished.”
This phenomenon has been more than once repeated.
“All shops at Bakshiganj, Mymensingh, have been looted and papers destroyed.
The Image of Kali has been broken to pieces;” but “I hear that a regular enquiry is not taking place in the Bakshiganj case.
Some of the accused who were arrested, have been let off.
First informations have not been taken in all the cases.”
Or take this suggestive telegram from Rangpur District: “The rowdy Mahomedans of the locality gathered and looted Bakshiganj Bazar and the houses of several 
Hindu residents of Charkaseria.
Females were outraged.
The looting continued from noon to midnight.”
Looting of Hindus accompanied by outrages on their women may continue from noon to midnight, and no one thinks it his business to interfere; but a few Mahomedan shops were supposed to be threatened and a British Magistrate at once appears on the scene.